
New European rules that could allow pilots to land planes after 22 hours without sleep could put passengers’ lives at risk, the UK pilots’ union, Balpa has warned.
Balpa and some pilots are concerned about EU rules on pilots’ working conditions, if introduced in the UK, which has strict rules governing their working hours.
The union claims that many pilots can struggle to stay awake, even under the current UK rules, which limit a pilot’s working hours to just over 16 hours.
According to Balpa, almost half of the 500 members it surveyed admitted to falling asleep in the cockpit and that a third of these pilots said they had woken to find their co-pilot asleep.
The new EU rules, it says, could lead to “extremely fatigued pilots.”
Concerns over flying hours
Balpa’s general secretary, Jim McAuslan said: “Compared to the UK’s domestic rules, the EU proposals would see pilots flying further – as far as California – with no back-up crew and, contrary to scientific advice, allow pilots to do up to seven early starts in a row, which is desperately fatiguing.”
The new European rules, which are designed to harmonise pilots’ working hours across the Continent – come from the EU aviation regulator, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
The pilots’ union is concerned that the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) – which regulates air travel in the UK – supports the proposed changes and claims they are not backed up by scientific research.
Flawed research
Richard Toomer, Balpa spokesperson told Terminal U: “Fundamentally these rules were flawed from the start because they were not drawn up by scientific experts in the field. There were no medics, no sleep scientists on the group who came up with them. So, ideally, we think it would be best to throw them out and start again.
“If that doesn’t happen we would need to see significant improvement to the rules before they could be considered safe.
“We need assurances from the Transport Minister that the UK would not support, and would seek to get an opt-out from, any rules which reduce safety standards here in the UK as these [rules] undoubtedly would.”
The CAA has rejected claims the EU rules would compromise passenger safety, while EASA says the proposals are based on the latest sleep science.
CAA chief executive Andrew Haines said that the study of pilot fatigue was “not an exact science” and that having one set of rules across the 27 member states would make UK travellers safer.
He added that instances of pilots staying awake for 22 hours would be “exceptionally rare”.
A CAA spokesperson told Terminal U: “Overall we now think the current proposal, together with other regulations, such as the European Work Time Directive, and our continuous oversight of airlines, provides a package that will work for Europe.
“It [the new rules] will raise safety levels across many countries whose airlines UK citizens use which currently have lower levels of regulation on pilot hours.”




I would have to agree. I trained itniially at a typical flight school with new CFI’s. My training was excellent, and both the CFI’s I worked closest with are now very close friends, and I do not discount their skills as CFI’s, but both were under 1,000 total time.I finished my Commercial and CFI training at another school with a super HIGH time pilot who had been in the business since the Certification of the R22. HUGE difference in training. He taught me things and introduced me to other pilots and really moved my career forward by leaps and bounds something just not available at a large pilot puppy mills (so to speak) flight school. IBP
AS retired Airline Pilot , I agree this would put alot of strain on Pilots specially on a long haul flights , their could be an element of numerous risks . Accidents may occur as a result of Pilots fatigue . Whilst I do understand with the latest state of art on board that enhance Pilots perfpormance and reliable automation systems may assist Pilots in reducing those risks none the less the number of hours being considered in my opinion appears to be a lot to say the least . Once UK CAA blessed this we are in fo a suprise as many countries look upon UK CAA regulations in setting up or updating their own in their countries along the lines of UK CAA. I hope EU Civil Aviation Regulatory body in conjuction eoth ICAO take a serious look into this matter and review once again before going full ahead and impliment what could be the most sensitive issue ever contempleted into delibrating it. the lives of so many around the world could be at risk !!
Even 16hrs is a long shift, particularly with the time needed before starting a shift.
22hrs is just ridiculous.
The final part of flight with approach through air traffic and landing is busiest and in many times the most critical part of the flight.
To have fatigued pilots who have been awake for over 24hrs managing approach and landing is insane.
Regards
Helmut Maertin
Asian production and quality services: http://www.qpiltd.com
You are welcome to connect> http://www.linkedin.com/in/qpiltd 敬请关注QPI微博http://weibo.com/qpiltd & http://twitter.com/QPILtd